Smith and Kant: An Enquiry into the Ambivalences of Luxury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/30250Abstract
This study examines the concept of luxury through the contrasting perspectives of two 18th-century philosophers, exploring its moral, economic and political dimensions in the context of an emerging commercial society. Historically, luxury has been debated as both a driver of social progress and a source of inequality and moral concern. Unlike other contributors to this debate, this analysis focuses on two thinkers, Smith and Kant, who held marginal views on luxury, yet whose work reveals its complex role in liberal political theory. Smith takes an empirical approach, viewing luxury as intertwined with the rationality, sociability and sensitivity of human nature. In this view, luxury supports commerce, industry, and social refinement, ultimately benefiting society despite its association with vanity and excess. It promotes economic development, property rights, and the legal systems necessary to sustain a commercial society. Kant conceptualises luxury through a moral-philosophical lens, viewing it as a matter of duty and autonomy. He condemns luxury when it leads to excesses that are detrimental to individual dignity and communal welfare. This perspective highlights freedom, moral virtue, and culture as being essential to understanding the limits and implications of luxury. Juxtaposing these two perspectives sheds light on the differing conceptions of human nature, morality and societal progress found in modern thought. While one sees luxury as a natural and positive force in economic and social evolution, the other warns of its potential to undermine virtue and social cohesion. Together, these views provide a nuanced understanding of the ambivalent role of luxury in shaping modern liberal societies.
Downloads
References
Cohen, A. (ed. by), Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology. A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.
Carnevali, B., Social appearances. A philosophy of display and prestige, Columbia University Press, New York 2020.
Berry, C., The Idea of Commercial Society in the Scottish Enlightenment, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 2015.
Berry, C., The Idea of Luxury, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994.
Fiori Carones, G., Una singola definizione di lusso? Verso una lussuologia, in “Itinera”, XXIX, 2025.
M. Berg and E. Eager (ed. by), Luxury in Eighteenth Century, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2003.
Hont, I., Ignatieff, M., Wealth and Virtue, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1983.
Kant, I., Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798), ed. by R.B. Louden, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
Kant, I., Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790), ed. by P. De Guyer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.
Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), ed. by M. Gregor and J. Timmermann, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011.
Kant, I., Practical Philosophy, ed. by M. J. Gregor, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
Simonazzi, M., Le favole della filosofia : saggi su Bernard Mandeville, Franco Angeli, Milano 2008.
Smith, A., An Inquiry into the Nature and the Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), ed. by W. Playfair, Routledge, Abingdon, New York 1995.
Smith, A., Lectures of Jurisprudence (1763), ed. by R. L. Meek, D.D. Raphael, P.G. Stein, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis 1982.
Smith, A., The Index of the Works of Adam Smith, ed. by K. Haakonssen and A.S. Skinner , Oxford University Press, Indianapolis 2001.
Smith, A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759), ed. by K. Haakonssen, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004, p. 129.
Robinson, E., Surprenant, C. W. (ed. by), Kant and the Scottish Enlightenment, Routledge, New York 2018.
Willaschek, M., Stolzenberger, J., Mohr, G., Bacin, S., Höwing, T., Förster, E. (ed. by), Kant-Lexikon, vol. 2, De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston 2015.
S. Fleischacker, Values behind the market: Kant’s response to the “Wealth of Nations”, in “History of Political Thought”, XVII/3, 1996.
Lai, C., Adam Smith Across Nations: Translations and Receptions of the Wealth of Nations, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gregorio Fiori Carones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Itinera are required to accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the rights on their paper and lincese the journal the right of first publication. The paper is also licensed under a Creative Commons License, which allows others to share it, by indicating intellectual authorship and its first publication in Itinera.
2. Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the paper (ex. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that its first publication in Itinera is indicated.
3. Authors can disseminate their paper online (ex. in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, since this can lead to productive exchanges and increase quotations of the published work (See “The Effect of Open Access”).
