L’ITALIANO NEL LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE DI MOSCA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-3597/27768Abstract
Questo articolo propone un’interpretazione dello spazio e del ruolo che occupa l’italiano nell’attuale Linguistic Landscape (LL) statico di Mosca. Vengono presi in considerazione i possibili effetti del conflitto russo-ucraino, le cui ricadute potrebbero aver inciso sulla quantità di italiano presente nella capitale russa. Nel 2019, una ricerca dottorale aveva indagato la percezione rispetto alla presenza della nostra lingua nel LL statico della città, da parte di studenti universitari di italiano come seconda o terza LS. Lo studio mirava a comprendere se l’italiano fosse considerato un elemento stabile e poco distintivo nel contesto urbano plurilingue e interculturale. Gli esiti sembrano confermare che, nonostante la compromissione dei rapporti ufficiali fra l’Italia e la Federazione Russa, la presenza dell’italiano nel LL di Mosca non appare compromesso in maniera significativa.
Italian in the linguistic landscape of Moscow
This article presents an interpretation of the space and role of Italian language in today’s Moscow static Linguistic Landscape (LL). The potential effects of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, whose consequences may have affected the presence of the Italian language into the Russian capital, are taken into account. In 2019, a doctoral research investigated the perception of the presence of Italian in the static LL of the city, by university students of Italian as second or third FL. The study aimed at clarifying whether Italian was perceived as a stable and non-distinctive element in the multilingual and intercultural context of the city. The results seem to confirm that, despite the deterioration of the official relationships between Italy and the Russian Federation, the presence of the Italian in the LL of Moscow does not appear significantly compromised.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Backaus P. (2007), Linguistic Landscapes: a comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokio, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.
Bagna C., Barni M. (2007), “La lingua italiana nella comunicazione pubblica/sociale planetaria”, in SILTA, 36, 3, pp. 529-553.
Баранова В., Федорова К. (2020), “Регулирование языкового ландшафта в российских городах: многоязычие и неравенство”, in The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 18, pp. 625-64016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-4-625-640
РЕГУЛИРОВАНИЕ ЯЗЫКОВОГОЛАНДШАФТА В РОССИЙСКИХ ГОРОДАХ:МНОГОЯЗЫЧИЕ И НЕРАВЕНСТВО (cyberleninka.ru).
Barni M., Bagna C. (2006), “Per una mappatura dei repertori linguistici urbani: nuovi strumenti e metodologie”, in De Blasi N., Marcato C. (a cura di), La città e le sue lingue. Repertori linguistici urbani, Liguori, Napoli, pp.1-43.
Barni M., Bagna C. (2010), “Linguistic landscape and Language vitality”, in Shohamy E., Ben-Rafael E., Barni M. (eds.), Linguistic Landscape in the City, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp. 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-003
Barthes R. (2006), Il senso della moda. Forme e significati dell’abbigliamento, Einaudi, Torino.
Ben-Rafael E., Shohamy E., Amara M. H., Trumper-Hecht N. (2006), “Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel”, in Gorter D. (ed.), Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism, Multilingualism Matters, Clevedon, pp. 7-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599170-002
Celentin P., Cognigni E. (2023), Il nuovo studente di origine slava, La Linea Blu, Bologna.
Celentin P., Cognigni E. (2005), Lo studente di origine slava, Guerra, Perugia.
Cenoz J., Gorter D. (2006), “Linguistic Landscape and Minority Languages”, in International Journal of Multilingualism, 3, 1, pp. 67-80: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668386
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255593078_Linguistic_Landscape_and_Minority_Languages.
Dalla Libera C. (2017), La comunicazione interculturale fra italiani e russi, Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, Venezia: 978-88-6969-148-5_nezm1yH.pdf (unive.it).
Фабьен Б. (2016), Тольятти. Рождение нового города, Tatlin, Екатеринбург 17.
Федорова Л. Л. (2014), “Языковой ландшафт: город и толпа”, in Вестн. Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Серия: История, филология, Т. 13, вып. 6: Журналистика, pp. 70-80.
Gorter D., Cenoz J. (2017), “Linguistic landscape and multilingualism”, in Language awareness and multilingualism, 3, pp. 233-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6_27
Gorter D. (ed.) (2006), Linguistic Landscape: A new approach to Multilingualism, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599170
Jaworski A., Thurlow C. (2010), “Introducing semiotic landscapes”, in Jaworski A., Thurlow C. (eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, image, space, Continuum, London, pp. 1-40.
Kallen J. (2010), “Changing landscapes: Language, space and policy in the Dublin linguistic landscape”, in Jaworski A., Thurlow C. (eds.), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, image, space, Continuum, London, pp. 41-58.
Laitinen M., Zabrodskaja A. (eds.), Dimentions of Sociolinguistic Landscapes in Europe. Materials and Methodological Solutions, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Landry R., Bourhis R.Y. (1997), “Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study”, in Journal of language and social psychology, 16, 1, pp. 23-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
Lotman J. M. (2017), Conversazioni sulla cultura russa, (a cura di Burini S.), Bompiani, Milano.
Moriarty M. (2014), “Languages in motion: Multilingualism and mobility in the linguistic landscape”, in International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 5, pp. 457-463: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913484208
Ornstein J. (1958), “Foreign Language Training in the Soviet Union-A Qualitative View”, in The Modern Language Journal, 42, 8, pp. 382-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1958.tb01439.x
Perotto M. (2015), “The presence of the Italian language in the linguistic landscape of Moscow”, in Laitinen M., Zabrodskaja A. (eds.), Dimentions of Sociolinguistic Landscapes in Europe. Materials and Methodological Solutions, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 263-282.
Протасова Е. (2015), “Вариативность лингвистического ландшафта”, in Экология языка и коммуникативная практика, 1, pp. 91-10219:
Вариативность лингвистического ландшафта России (cyberleninka.ru).
Щербаков О. В. (2020), “Роль лингвистического ландшафта города при изучении социально-культурных ценностей постиндустриального общества”, in О. В. Щербаков О. В. (ed.), Практики воспроизводства ценностей: гуманитарный,
социальный и экономический аспекты: сборник тезисов докладов Всероссийской научной конференции студентов-стипендиатов Оксфордского Российского фонда. Екатеринбург, 14-15 ноября 2019 г. Издательство Уральского университета, Екатеринбург, pp. 348-350.
Shohamy E. (2015), “LL research as expanding language and language policy”, in Linguistic Landscape, 1, 1/2, pp. 152-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.09sho
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0.
