Biodiversity and Aesthetics: some historical remarks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/29667Keywords:
Aesthetic experience of nature, Gracián, Addison, GoetheAbstract
This article explores the historical roots of the aesthetic experience of biodiversity, focusing on a formative period of modern aesthetics between the mid-17th and late 18th centuries. Drawing on the works of Balthasar Gracián, Joseph Addison, and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, the paper argues that the diversity and multitude of living species – what we now call biodiversity – were already central to proto-aesthetic and early aesthetic reflections on nature. Although lacking modern ecological awareness, these authors attributed profound emotional, philosophical, and symbolic value to the variety of life. Gracián’s concept of the innocent gaze, Addison’s aesthetic of novelty and fullness of being, and Goethe’s morphological insights into metamorphosis each exemplify a distinct mode of aesthetically engaging with biodiversity. The study concludes with critical reflections on the limits of linking aesthetic appreciation to ethical responsibility in contemporary debates on conservation, warning against instrumental or scientistic appropriations of aesthetic experience.
Downloads
References
Addison J. and Others, The Spectator, vol. 3., D. F. Bond (ed. by), The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1965 (No. 412).
Addison J. and Others, The Spectator, vol. 4., D. F. Bond (ed. by), The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1965 (No. 519).
Axer E., Shields R., The Seed of an Idea, the Idea of a Seed: Goethe’s Urpflanze in the 21st century, 2022, https://www.plantphilosophy.org.uk/plants-and-philosophy-in-the-present/the-seed-of-an-idea-the-idea-of-a-seed-goethes-urpflanze-in-the-21st-century/
Benjamin W., Goethe’s Elective Affinities, transl. by S. Corngold, in M. Bullcok and M. W. Jennings (ed. by) Selected Writings, Volume 1: 1913–1926, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, London, 1996.
Cicero, De natura deorum; Academica, transl. by H. Rackham, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Desideri F., Hotspot. Estetica e biodiversità, in “Re-Vista. Research for Landscape Architecture”, IX/1–2, 2015, pp. 57-63.
Eckermann J.P., Conversations of Goethe, transl. by J. Oxenford, Digital Production by http://www.hxa7241.org, 2010.
Empedocles, The Extant Fragments, transl. by M. R. Wright, Yale University Press, New Haven, London, 1981.
Goethe J. W., Italian Journey, transl. by W. H. Auden & E. Mayer, North Point Press, San Francisco, 1982.
Goethe J. W., Toward a General Comparative Theory, transl. by M. Bell, in M. Bell (ed. by) The Essential Goethe, Princeton University Press, Princeton, Oxford, 2016, pp. 937-938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400874255-020
Gracián B., The Critick, transl. by P. Rycaut, Henry Brome, London, 1681.
Kellert S.R., Social and Perceptual Factors in the Preservation of Animal Species, in B. G. Norton (ed. by) The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986, pp. 50-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400857869.50
Lovejoy A.O., The Great Chain of Being, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, transl. by M. Ferguson Smith, Hackett, Indianapolis, Cambridge, 2001.
Mikkonen J., Raatikainen K.J., Aesthetics in Biodiversity Conservation, in “The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism”, LXXXII/2, 2024, pp. 174–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpae020
Somlyó B., Az ősfenomén mint a képi megismerés alapfogalma [The Archetypal Phenomenon as the Basic Concept of Pictorial Cognition], in “Laokoón”, 2020, https://laokoon.hu/somlyo-balint-az-osfenomen-mint-a-kepi-megismeres-alapfogalma
Žižek S., The Indivisible Remainder: on Schelling and Related Matters, Verso, London, New York, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Endre Szécsényi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Itinera are required to accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the rights on their paper and lincese the journal the right of first publication. The paper is also licensed under a Creative Commons License, which allows others to share it, by indicating intellectual authorship and its first publication in Itinera.
2. Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the paper (ex. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that its first publication in Itinera is indicated.
3. Authors can disseminate their paper online (ex. in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, since this can lead to productive exchanges and increase quotations of the published work (See “The Effect of Open Access”).


