Music as the finest disgust? A Kantian take on cacophony in the Critique of Judgement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2039-9251/29705Keywords:
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgement, Philosophy of music, 18th century German aestheticsAbstract
The Kantian system of the fine arts notoriously places music at the bottom of the ladder; to be precise, it looks almost like it does not even deserve a place in the classification insofar as music, according to Kant, ought to be considered more an agreeable than a fine art. The aim of our paper is to inquire whether the peculiar status Kant ascribes to music can provide unique access to some issues of negative aesthetics that can be found in the Critique of Judgement: specifically, questions concerning the problem of the form of music as art in relation to its ability to cause unappealing as well as unwholesome feelings. Only those musical forms that preserve the formal purity of the instrument’s Ton seem to foreshadow the possibility of a music that claims for itself to be deemed more than just agreeable.
Downloads
References
FELOJ, S. 2013, Is there a negative judgment of taste? Disgust as the real ugliness in Kant’s aesthetics, “Lebenswelt”, 3: 175-185.
GUYER, P. 2012, Values of beauty. Historical essays in aesthetics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
KANT, I. 1781/1787, Kritik der reinen Vernunft; ed. by P. Guyer, A.W. Wood, Critique of pure reason, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998. 1790, Kritik der Urteilskraft; ed. by W.S. Pluhar, Critique of judgement, Indianapolis (IN), Hackett, 1987.
KIVY, P. 1993, The fine art of repetition: Essays in the philosophy of music. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
MATHERNE, S. 2014, Kant’s expressive theory of music, “The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism”, 72/2: 129-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12076
STEENHAGEN, M. 2010, Explaining the ugly: disharmony and unrestrained cognition in Kant, “Esthetica. Tijdschrift voor Kunst en Philosophie”.
[https://estheticatijdschrift.nl/2010-2/]
WENZEL, C. 1999, Kant finds nothing ugly?, “British Journal of Aesthetics”, 39/4: 416-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/39.4.416
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Manuel Mazzucchini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Itinera are required to accept the following conditions:
1. The authors retain the rights on their paper and lincese the journal the right of first publication. The paper is also licensed under a Creative Commons License, which allows others to share it, by indicating intellectual authorship and its first publication in Itinera.
2. Authors may adhere to other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the paper (ex. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided that its first publication in Itinera is indicated.
3. Authors can disseminate their paper online (ex. in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, since this can lead to productive exchanges and increase quotations of the published work (See “The Effect of Open Access”).
