Husserl on the Concept of Anzahl
Three Ways Not to Conceive it
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2239-5474/28951Keywords:
Husserl, Philosophy of Arithmetic, Cardinal Number, Material Content, Formal Concept, SignAbstract
This article addresses the concept of Anzahl (cardinal number) as understood by the early Husserl, who made it the foundation of his Philosophy of Arithmetic (1891). The discussion is developed through a comparative approach: after retracing the key features of the characterization of the cardinal number presented in that work, the paper examines the criticisms Husserl directs at three alternative theories – two of which are found within the Philosophy of Arithmetic itself, and one is presented in a lecture given in 1901. These comparisons provide an opportunity to appreciate the specificity of certain aspects of Husserl’s philosophy of mathematics, which is centered on the acts performed by the subject. Moreover, they offer valuable insights for re-examining two recurring themes in The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (1954): the problematic relationship between mathematical ideality and the Lebenswelt, and the preference for a mathematical practice centered on a symbolic mode of thought.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rodolfo Castagnino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
