SVILUPPARE LA COMPETENZA LINGUISTICA IN ITALIANO LS TRAMITE IL FEEDBACK INDIRETTO E LE TECNOLOGIE DIGITALI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-3597/27898Abstract
Questo contributo presenta un’esperienza didattica progettata per raggiungere vari obiettivi, e ne riporta i risultati tratti da un’indagine quantitativa e qualitativa. Gli scopi delle due attività pratiche proposte agli apprendenti, pensate e realizzate tenendo in considerazione il contesto di svolgimento del corso, volevano a) stimolare la riflessione metalinguistica, b) migliorare la competenza linguistica, c) migliorare l’accuratezza e la fluidità della produzione orale, d) incentivare la motivazione. Si voleva anche verificare l’efficacia del feedback correttivo indiretto, associato all'uso delle tecnologie digitali, e se l’impiego di entrambi potesse essere un efficace mezzo di coinvolgimento e di stimolo all’autonomia nell’apprendimento. Nel contributo, dopo aver presentato le basi teoriche dello studio, si dettagliano le attività realizzate, si danno esempi del feedback fornito dal docente, con esempi dei vari gradi di implicitezza applicati, e si forniscono esempi e dati degli errori risolti dagli apprendenti.
Developing linguistic competence in italian ls through indirect feedback and digital technologies
This contribution presents a didactic experience designed to achieve various objectives, and reports the results drawn from a quantitative and qualitative analysis. The aims of the two practical activities proposed to the learners, conceived and implemented taking into account the context of the course, were a) to stimulate metalinguistic reflection, b) to improve linguistic competence, c) to improve the accuracy and fluency of oral production, d) to stimulate motivation. It was also intended to test the effectiveness of indirect corrective feedback, combined with the use of digital technologies, and whether the use of both could be an effective means of engaging and stimulating autonomy in learning. In the contribution, after presenting the theoretical basis of the study, the activities carried out are detailed, examples of the feedback provided by the teacher are given, with examples of the various degrees of implicitness applied. Examples and data of the errors resolved by the learners are provided too.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Addazi G. (2020), “Il gioco e la dimensione metalinguistica. Riflessioni sull’insegnamento grammaticale”, in Italiano a Scuola, 2, 1, pp. 19-38.
Ali M. M. T. (2022), “Analisi degli errori morfosintattici più frequenti nell’italiano degli studenti egiziani”, in EL.LE, 11, 2, pp. 155-178.
Aljaafreh A., Lantolf J. P. (1994), “Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development”, in The Modern Language Journal, 78, 4, pp. 465-483.
Allwright D., Bailey K. (1991), Focus on the Language Classroom: an Introduction to Classroom Research for Language Teachers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bailini S. L. (2020), “El Feedback como herramienta didáctica para el fomento de la autonomía en la adquisición de lenguas extranjeras”, in Philologia Hispalensis, 34, 1, pp. 25-39.
Bazzanella C. (2008), Linguistica e pragmatica del linguaggio, Laterza, Bari.
Bitchener J., Dana F. (2012), Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing,
Routledge, New York.
Boulima, J. (1999), Negotiated interaction in target language classroom discourse, J. Benjamins,
Amsterdam.
Butler Y. G. (2002), “Second Language Learners’ Theories on the Use of English Articles: An Analysis of the Metalinguistic Knowledge Used by Japanese Students, in Acquiring the English Article System”, in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 3, pp. 451-480.
Cella R., Viale M. (2021), “Che cosa resterà della didattica a distanza?”, in Italiano a Scuola, 3, 1, pp. I-VI.
Corder S. P. (1967), “The significance of Learners’ Errors”, in International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, pp. 147-159.
Council of Europe (2020), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume, Strasbourg: https://rm.coe.int/commoneuropean-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4. Trad it. a cura di Barsi M., Lugarini E., Quadro comune europeo di riferimento per le lingue: apprendimento, insegnamento, valutazione. Volume complementare, in Italiano LinguaDue, 12, 2, 2020: https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/promoitals/article/view/15120.
De Marco A. (2021), “La pragmatica come visione prospettica sui fatti linguistici”, in Filosofi(e) Semiotiche, 8, 2, pp. 42-56.
Dede C. (2022), “The Coming Sea-Change in Teacher Education”, in Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30, 2, pp. 117-125.
Egbert J. (2020), “Engagement, Technology, and Language Tasks: Optimizing Student Learning”, in International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2, 4, pp. 110-118.
Ellis R. (1994), The study of second language acquisition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ellis R. (2004), “The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge”, in Language Learning, 54, 2, pp. 227-275.
Ellis R. (2006), Researching the effects of form-focussed instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review, 19, pp. 18-41.
Ellis R. (2008), The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ellis R. (2009), “A typology of written corrective feedback types”, in ELT Journal, 63, pp. 97-107.
Ellis R. (2010), “Epilogue: A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback”, in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 2, pp. 335-349.
Ellis R., Shintani N. (2014), Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research, Routledge, London.
Ferreira Cabreira A. (2017), “El efecto del feedback correctivo para mejorar la destreza escrita en ELE”, in Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19, 1, pp. 37-50.
Ferreira Cabrera A., Oportus Torres R. (2018), “Cognitive processing of Indirect Written Corrective Feedback (IWCF) of prepositional errors in Spanish as a Foreign Language (SFL)”, in Boletín de filología, 53, 1, pp. 83-108.
Ferris D. (2010), “Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA intersections and practical applications”, in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 2, pp. 181-201.
Gass S., Behney J., Plonsky L. (2013), Second language acquisition: An introductory course, Routledge, New York.
Heift T., Nguyen P. (2021), “Technology-Mediated Corrective Feedback”, in Nassaji H., Kartchava E.(eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 226-250.
Hendrickson J. (1978), “Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice”, in The Modern Language Journal, 62, 8, pp. 387-398.
Kerr P. (2020). “Giving Feedback to Language Learners”, in Cambridge Papers in ELT, March 2020, pp. 1-28: https://www.cambridge.org/gb/files/4415/8594/0876/Giving_Feedback_minipaper_ONLINE.pdf.
Krashen S. D. (1981), Second language acquisition and second language learning, Pergamon Press,
Oxford.
La Russa F., Nuzzo E. (2021), “Peer corrective feedback as an opportunity for metalinguistic reflection in tandem telecollaboration”, in EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 8, 2, pp. 87-104.
Li S., Vuono A. (2019), “Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System”, in System, V, 84, pp. 93-109.
Lightbown P. M., Spada N. (1999), How languages are learned, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lyster R., Ranta L. (1997), “Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms”, in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1, pp. 37-66.
Lyster R., Saito K. (2010), “Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis”, in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 2, pp. 265-302.
Martari Y. (2020), “Linguistica per la scrittura. Istruzioni linguistiche e revisione in classi ad abilità miste L1 e L2”, in Sansò A. (a cura di), Insegnare Linguistica: basi epistemologiche, metodi, applicazioni. Atti del LIII Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana – Università dell’Insubria, 19-21 settembre 2019, Officinaventuno, Milano, pp. 207-221.
Mishra P. (2019), “Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade”, in Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35, 2, pp. 76-78.
Monami E. (2013), Strategie di correzione orale dell’errore in classi di italiano L2, Guerra, Perugia.
Monami E. (2021), Correggere l’errore nella classe di italiano L2, Edilingua, Roma.
Morozov E. (2016), La locura del solucionismo tecnológico, Katz Editores, Buenos Aires.
Nassaji H., Kartchava E. (2017), “The role of corrective feedback: Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives”, in Nassaji H., Kartchava E. (eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications, Routledge, New York, pp. ix-xv.
Nassaji H., Kartchava E. (2020), “Corrective Feedback and Good Language Teachers”, in Griffiths C., Tajeddin Z. (eds.), Lessons from Good Language Teachers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 151-163.
Pallotti G. (2009), “Descrivere le lingue: quale metalinguaggio per un’educazione linguistica efficace?”, in Progetto PON Educazione Linguistica e Letteraria in un’ottica plurilingue (MIUR/ANSAS):
Panova I., Lyster R. (2012), “Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom”, in TESOL Quaterly, 36, pp. 573-595.
Paradis M. (1994), “Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA”, in Ellis N. (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages, Academic Press, London, pp. 393-419.
Pedrazzini L. (2017), “Dealing with students’ errors: oral corrective feedback in the Italian EFL classroom”, in Altre Modernità, 17, pp. 98-117.
Peppoloni D. (2021), “Caratteristiche e implicazioni di una glottodidattica mobile. Un possibile quadro teorico-metodologico di riferimento”, in E-JournALL, EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 8, 2, pp. 125-141.
Pinto M. A. (2015), La Consapevolezza metalinguistica: Concetti e strumenti di misurazione in lingua
italiana e tedesca, Schweizer Schule Rom: https://www.pintomatel.com/wpcontent/uploads/2018/08/48.CML_SCHWEIZER_SCHULE.pdf.
Punie Y., Redecker C. (2017), European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu, EUR 28775 EN, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466.
Rahimi M., Kushki A., Nassaji H. (2015), “Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing, in Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2, 2, pp. 185-208.
Roehr K. (2008), “Metalinguistic knowledge and language ability in university-level L2 learners”, in Applied Linguistics, 29, 2, pp. 173-199.
Scierri I. D. M (2023), “Per una valutazione centrata sull’allievo: framework teorico e primi risultati di un’indagine su concezioni e strategie valutative degli insegnanti”, in Lifelong, Lifewide Learning (LLL), 19, 42, pp. 83-101.
Scierri I. D. M., Batini F. (2018), “La valutazione per favorire l’apprendimento: il caso di un corso di studi universitario”, in Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 14, 31, pp. 110-123.
Sheen Y. (2010), “Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom”, in Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, pp. 203-234.
Sheen Y. (2011), Corrective feedback individual differences and second language learning, Springer,
New York.
Skehan P. (1998), A cognitive approach to language learning, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Smith M. S. (1991), “Speaking to many minds: on the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner”, in Interlanguage studies bulletin, 7, 2, pp. 118-132.
Stockwell G. (2022), Mobile assisted language learning. Concepts, contexts and challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Storai F., Pedani V. (2021), “Uno studio sul gradimento del feedback in due corsi universitari online”, in Corsi M., Rossi P. G., Giannandrea L., Miller G. E. (a cura di), Valutazione, feedback, equità: una sfida per la didattica, FrancoAngeli, Milano, pp. 296-308.
Swain M. (1993), “The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough”, in Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 1, pp. 158-164.
Thurlings M., Vermeulen M., Bastiaens T., Stijnen S. (2013), “Understanding feedback: A Learning theory perspective”, in Educational Research Review, 9, pp. 1-15.
Torresan P. (2023), “Valutazione tra pari di testi argomentativi: riflessioni degli apprendenti”, in Italiano LinguaDue, 15, 1, pp. 950-972: https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/promoitals/article/view/20446.
Trujillo F., Cassany D., Combe C., Ferreira A., Ollivier C., Román-Mendoza E. (2022), Tecnología versus/para el aprendizaje de lenguas, Difusión, Barcelona.
Truscott J. (1996), “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”, in Language Learning, 46, 2, pp. 327-369.
UNESCO (2018), A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2,
UNESCO, Montreal: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265403/PDF/265403eng.pdf.mu
lti.
UNESCO (2021), Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education, UNESCO,
Parigi: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en.
UNESCO (2023), Resumen del Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo 2023: Tecnología
en la educación: ¿Una herramienta en los términos de quién?, UNESCO, Parigi:
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386147_spa.locale=es.
Vygotsky L. S. (1978), Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard
University Press, Cambridge.
Vygotsky L. S. (1986), Thought and Language, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Watson A. M., Newman R. M. C. (2017), “Talking grammatically: L1 adolescent metalinguistic reflection on writing”, in Language awareness, 26, 4, pp. 381-398.
Wiliam D. (2018), Embedded formative assessment, Solution Tree Press, Bloomington.
Zan R. (2007), Difficoltà in matematica. Osservare, interpretare, intervenire, Springer, Milano.
Zhao Y. (2022), “New Context, New Teachers, and New Teacher Education”, in Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30, 2, pp. 127-133.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Fabrizio Ruggeri
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0.
