COMPETENZE GRAMMATICALI E INTERCULTURALI NELLA DIDATTICA MEDIATA DALL’INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE: UN’ESPERIENZA DI FORMAZIONE PER DOCENTI DI ITALIANO L2/LS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-3597/30437Abstract
L’integrazione dell’intelligenza artificiale nella didattica delle lingue apre prospettive inedite per l’insegnamento della grammatica e lo sviluppo della competenza interculturale, sollevando al contempo questioni di natura pedagogica ed etica. Il presente contributo analizza le percezioni di un gruppo internazionale di docenti di italiano L2/LS che hanno partecipato a un percorso di formazione e aggiornamento presso l’Università per Stranieri di Perugia, incentrato sui più recenti approcci e metodi per lo sviluppo delle competenze grammaticali e interculturali, anche attraverso l’uso di strumenti di IA. Lo studio, condotto con approccio misto, ha combinato un questionario quantitativo e qualitativo per indagare pratiche, atteggiamenti e riflessioni dei docenti. I risultati mostrano che l’IA è percepita come risorsa versatile per la progettazione didattica e la personalizzazione dei percorsi di apprendimento, in grado di promuovere autonomia, riflessione metalinguistica e maggiore coinvolgimento. Al contempo, emergono criticità legate a bias, semplificazioni e alla limitata capacità degli strumenti di cogliere sfumature linguistiche e culturali, confermando il ruolo imprescindibile della mediazione docente. Lo studio restituisce una visione cautamente ottimistica sull’impiego dell’IA nell’educazione linguistica, suggerendo che il valore formativo di tali strumenti risiede nella loro capacità di potenziare la dimensione comunicativa e interculturale all'interno di cornici metodologiche consapevoli e inclusive.
Grammar and Intercultural Competence in AI-Mediated Language Education: A Teacher Training Experience in Teaching Italian as a Foreign/Second Language
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into language education opens new perspectives for grammar instruction and the development of intercultural competence, while also raising pedagogical and ethical concerns. This paper examines the perceptions of an international group of teachers of Italian as a second/foreign language who participated in a training programme at the University for Foreigners of Perugia. The programme was designed to explore recent approaches and methods for grammar and intercultural teaching, including the use of AI-based tools. The study, conducted through a mixed-methods approach, combined quantitative and qualitative questionnaires to investigate teachers’ practices, attitudes, and reflections. Findings indicate that AI is perceived as a versatile resource for lesson planning and for personalizing learning pathways, fostering learner autonomy, metalinguistic reflection, and engagement. At the same time, concerns emerged regarding algorithmic bias, oversimplification, and the limited ability of AI systems to capture linguistic and cultural nuances, thereby reaffirming the indispensable role of teacher mediation. The study offers a cautiously optimistic perspective on the use of AI in language education, suggesting that the educational value of such tools lies in their capacity to enhance communicative and intercultural dimensions within conscious and inclusive methodological frameworks.
Downloads
References
Bahari A., Han F., Strzelecki A. (2025), “Integrating CALL and AIALL for an Interactive Pedagogical Model of Language Learning”, in Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1-29.
Balboni P. E. (2025), Capovolgere la formazione dei docenti di italiano, lingue straniere e lingue classiche, Edizioni Ca’ Foscari, Venezia.
Belda-Medina J., Calvo-Ferrer J. R. (2022), “Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning”, in Applied Sciences, 12, 17, pp. 1-16.
Braun V., Clarke V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, in Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, pp. 77-101.
Byram M. (1997), Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence, Multilingual Matters, Bristol.
Cinganotto L., Montanucci G. (2025), Intelligenza artificiale per l’educazione linguistica, UTET Università, Torino.
Cinganotto L., Montanucci G. (2024), “L’intelligenza artificiale per l’apprendimento dell’italiano L2/LS. Risultati preliminari di una sperimentazione”, in Status Quaestionis, 26, pp. 617-635: https://doi.org/10.13133/2239-1983/18792.
Cinganotto L., Montanucci G., Samu B. (2025), “I docenti di Italiano LS in Egitto e le glottotecnologie: Pratiche didattiche e formazione continua”, in Italiano LinguaDue, 17, 1, pp. 1120-1136: https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/promoitals/article/view/29129.
Council of Europe (2001), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Council of Europe (2020), Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing Strasbourg: https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languageslearning-teaching/16809ea0d4. Trad it. a cura di Barsi M., Lugarini E., Cardinaletti A., Quadro comune europeo di riferimento per le lingue: apprendimento, insegnamento, valutazione. Volume complementare, in Italiano LinguaDue, 12, 2, 2020:
https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/promoitals/article/view/15120/13999.
Coyle D., Meyer O. (2021), Beyond CLIL – Pluriliteracies Teaching for Deeper Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Creswell J. W. (2014), Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, Sage, New York.
Doughty C., Williams J. (1998), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ellis R., Basturkmen H., Loewen S. (2002), “Doing focus-on-form”, in System, 30, 4, pp. 419-432: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00047-7.
Ellis R. (2003), Task-based language learning and teaching, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Floridi L. (2020), Pensare l’infosfera: La filosofia come design concettuale, Raffaello Cortina Editore, Milano.
Gale N. K., Heath G., Cameron E., Rashid S., Redwood S. (2013), “Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research”, in BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 1: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
Grimes D., Warschauer M. (2010), “Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation”, in The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 8, 6, pp. 1-43.
Hattie J. (2023), Visible learning: The sequel, Routledge, London.
Huang W., Hew K. F., Fryer L. (2022), “Chatbots for language learning –Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning”, in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38, 1, pp. 237-257.
Hymes D. (1972), “On communicative competence”, in Pride J., Holmes J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics, Penguin Books, pp. 269-285.
Jia F., Sun D., Ma Q., Looi C.-K. (2022), “Developing an AI-based learning system for L2 learners’ authentic and ubiquitous learning in English language”, in Sustainability, 14, 23, 15527: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315527.
Johnson B., Onwuegbuzie A. (2004), “Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come”, in Educational Researcher, 33, 7, pp. 14-26: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.
Lee S., Jeon J., Choe H. (2025), “Enhancing pre-service teachers’ global Englishes awareness with technology: A focus on AI chatbots in 3D metaverse environments”, in TESOL Quarterly, 5, 1, pp. 49-74.
Long M. (1991), “Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology”, in De Bot K., Ginsberg R., Kramsch C. (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 39-52.
Long M., Crookes G. (1992), “Three approaches to task-based syllabus design”, in TESOL Quarterly, 26, 1, pp. 27-56.
Long M., Robinson P. (1998), “Focus on form: Theory, research and practice”, in Doughty C., Williams J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nassaji H., Fotos S. (2011), Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating formfocused instruction in communicative context, Routledge, London.
Nowell L., Norris J. M., White D. E., Moules N. J. (2017), “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria”, in International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1, pp. 1-13: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
Piccardo E., North B. (2019), The action-oriented approach: A dynamic vision of language education, Multilingual Matters, Bristol.
Ritchie J., Spencer L. (1994), “Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research”, in Bryman A., Burgess R. G. (eds.), Analysing qualitative data, Routledge, London, pp. 173-194.
Skehan P. (1996), “A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction”, in Applied Linguistics, 17, pp. 38-62.
Spinelli B., Parizzi F. (2010), Profilo della lingua italiana: Livelli di riferimento del QCER A1, A2, B1, B2, La Nuova Italia-RCS Libri, Firenze.
Steiss J. et al. (2024), “Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing”, in Learning and Instruction, 91, 101894, pp. 1-15: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894.
UNESCO (2021), Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455.
Van Parijs P. (2011), Linguistic justice for Europe and for the world, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wei L. (2023), “Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning”, in Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1261955, pp. 1-14: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955.
Zhang Z., Huang X. (2024), “The impact of chatbots based on large language models on second language vocabulary acquisition”, in Heliyon, 10, 3, pp. 1-13: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25370.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Letizia Cinganotto, Giorgia Montanucci, Borbala Samu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


