De l’intérêt de devenir-bulle: repenser la réalité virtuelle par le biais de la rondeur

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/2036-461X/19379

Keywords:

Virtual Reality, Bubble, Roundness, Inflatables, Expanded Cinema

Abstract

Despite the abundance of technologies available today, moving images still tend to be displayed on flat quadrangular screens. Virtual reality, however, is an exception. Indeed, thanks to the Head Mounted Display, it provides a circularization of the image. This paper aims to outline an archaeology of virtual immersive roundness through the prism of a specific metaphor: the bubble. Through the material qualities of the bubble such as transparency, aerial viscosity and elasticity, we can rethink the materiality of virtual reality as well as its historical and symbolic genealogy, from the first hot-air balloons to the inflatable experiments of expanded cinema.

Author Biography

Élise Jouhannet, University of Paris 3

Élise Jouhannet is a French independent researcher, author and poet. They graduated with a master's degree in Philosophy and Art History from the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. Their main research interests focus on the links between water and film in relation to immersive art and its most recent expressions such as virtual reality. They are currently in preparation of a PhD thesis about aquatic metaphors in art and media archaeology.

References

Albera, François. 1980. “Introduction.” In Sergueï Mikhaïlovitch Ėjzenštejn, Cinématisme, peinture et cinéma, edited by François Albera, 7–12. Bruxelles: Éditions Complexe.

Albera, François, Antonio Somaini, and Irina Tcherneva, eds. 2018. Le ciné-œil de la révolution: écrits sur le cinéma. Dziga Vertov. Dijon: Presses du réel.

Alloa, Emmanuel. 2008. “Architectures de la transparence.” Appareil 1: 1–17. doi: 10.4000/appareil.138.

Art Asia Pacific. “Interview with Jeffrey Shaw.” YouTube Video, 9:06. July 29, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFNRLIfbSNI.

Bachelard, Gaston. 1957. Poétique de l’espace. Paris: PUF.

Charbonnier, Louise. 2007. Cadre et regard: généalogie d’un dispositif. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Charre, Alain. 2012. Hans-Walter Müller et l’architecture de la disparition. Paris: Archibooks/Sautereau.

Chartrou, Jean-Jacques. 1931. Pétroles naturels et artificiels. Paris: Armand Colin.

Claus, Jürgen. 2003. “Stan Vanderbeek: an Early Space Art Pioneer.” Leonardo 36 (3): 229. doi: 10.1162/002409403321921451.

Centre National des Ressources Textuelles et Lexicales, “Définition d’immerger.” Consulté le 7 avril 2021. https://www.cnrtl.fr/definition/immerger.

Crary, Jonathan. 2010. Techniques de l’observateur: vision et modernité au XIXe siècle. Paris: Dehors.

Debray, Régis, and Louise Merzeau. 2005. “Médiasphère”. Médium 4 (3): 162–69. doi: 10.3917/mediu.004.0162.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1980. Capitalisme et schizophrénie 2. Mille plateaux. Paris: Minuit.

Doridot, Caroline, Catherine Hofmann, Arnaud Laborderie, François Nawrocki, Jean-Yves Sarazin, and Denis Savoie. 2019. “L’invention de la sphère.” Bibliothèque Nationale de France. Consulté le 27 novembre 2022. http://expositions.bnf.fr/monde-en-spheres/linvention-de-la-sphere/index.html.

Dubois, Philippe, Frédéric Monvoisin, and Elena Biserna eds. 2010. Extended Cinema: le cinéma gagne du terrain. Pasian di Prato: Campanotto Editore.

Duguet, Anne-Marie. 1996. “Jeffrey Shaw: From Expanded Cinema to Virtual Reality.” In Artifices 4: langages en perspectives, edited by Artifices, 14–26, Saint Denis: Direction des Affaires Culturelles. Catalogue d’exposition.

Duguet, Anne-Marie. 1997. “Jeffrey Shaw: From Expanded Cinema to Virtual Reality.” In Jeffrey Shaw: A User’s Manual, from Expanded Cinema to Virtual Reality, edited by Heinrich Klotz, Peter Weibel, and Anne-Marie Duguet, 21–57. Ostfildern-Ruit: Cantz.

Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.

Grau, Oliver. 1999. “Into the Belly of the Image: Historical Aspects of Virtual Reality.” Leonardo 32 (5): 365–71. doi: 10.1162/002409499553587.

Grau, Oliver. 2003. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Grespi, Barbara, and Alessandra Violi. 2021. “The Elastic Screen: Cinema and the Modern Imaginary of the Skin.” In Tattoo and the Moving Image, 9–31. Roma: Aracne.

Hansen, Mark. B.N. 2004. New Philosophy for New Media, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Helmreich, Stefan. 2011. “From Spaceship earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures.” In Social Research 78 (4): 1211–42. doi: 10.1353/sor.2011.0042

Huhtamo, Erkki. 2004. “Elements of Screenlogy: Toward an Archeology of the Screen.” ICONICS: International Studies of the Modern Image 7: 31–64. doi: 10.25969/mediarep/1958.

Jaspers, Karl. 1947. Von der Wahrheit. München: R. Piper & Co.

Jirat-Wasiutyński, Vojtěch. 1992. “The Balloon as Metaphor in the Early Work of Odilon Redon.” In Artibus et Historiae 13 (25): 195–206. doi: 10.2307/1483464.

Kant, Emmanuel. 1999. Géographie. Paris: Aubier.

Katz, Stéphanie. 2004. L’écran, de l’icône au virtuel. La résistance de l’infigurable. Paris: L’Harmattan.

King, Melanie. “Metaphors in Art and Science: The Bubble Representing the Brevity of Life.” Academia. Accessed June 5, 2022. https://www.academia.edu/3663336/Metaphors_in_Art_an

d_Science_The_Bubble_Representing_The_Brevity_of_Life.

Krauss, Rosalind. 1976. “Video: The Aesthetics of Narcissism.” October 1: 51–74. doi: 10.2307/778507.

Le Gall, Guillaume. 2022. Aquariorama. Histoire d’un dispositif. Paris: Mimésis.

McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McLuhan, Marshall. 1968. The Medium is the Massage. Paris: Firmin-Didot.

MEET Digital Culture Center. “MtMG Focus Online with Jeffrey Shaw.” Youtube video, 1:03:36. March 31, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKFWu2Coe-c.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. Le visible et l’invisible suivi de Notes de travail. Paris: Gallimard.

Müller, Hans Walter. 2022 [1975]. “Pourquoi les gonflables ?” In Hans-Walter Müller et l’architecture vivante, edited by Robert Stürzl, 55–58. Leipzig: Spector Books.

NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center. “Space Station Astronauts Grow a Water Bubble in Space.” YouTube video, 2:21. November 3, 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZEdA

pyi9Vw.

Olivero, Massimo. 2010. “Le concept d’extase: le cas de l’écran déchiré.” In Extended Cinema: le cinéma gagne du terrain, edited by Philippe Dubois, Frédéric Monvoisin, and Elena Biserna, 150–04. Pasian di Prato: Campanotto Editore.

Pantenburg, Volker. 2014. “Between Expansion and Contraction. Transatlantic Discontents of Expanded cinema.” In Cinéma exposé = Exhibited Cinema, edited by François Bovier and Adeena Mey: 109–13. Lausanne: École cantonale des Arts de Lausanne.

Pinotti, Andrea. 2020. “Towards An-Icology: The Image as Environment.” Screens, 61 (4): 594–603. doi: 10.1093/screen/hjaa060.

Rogers, Ariel. 2019. “Taking the Plunge: The New Immersive Screens.” In Screen Genealogies, from Optical Devices to Environmental Medium, edited by Craig Buckley, Rüdiger Campe, and Francesco Casetti, 135–58. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Shaw, Jeffrey. 1993. “Reisen in virtuellen Realitäten.” In Cyberspace: zum Medialen Gesamtkunstwerk, edited by Florian Rötzer and Peter Weibel, 329-30. Munich: Boer.

Sloterdijk, Peter. 2010, 2011, 2013. Sphères. 3 vols. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard/Pluriel.

Somaini, Antonio. 2010. “Le cinématisme du livre et de la ‘forme exposition’. Film und Foto (1929): Eisenstein, Moholy-Nagy, El-Lissitzky.” In Extended Cinema: le cinéma gagne du terrain, edited by Philippe Dubois, Frédéric Monvoisin, and Elena Biserna, 53–59. Pasian di Prato: Campanotto Editore.

Somaini, Antonio. 2011. “Utopies et dystopies de la transparence. Eisenstein, Glass House, et le cinématisme de l’architecture de verre. ” Appareil 7 (2): 1–33. doi: 10.4000/appareil.1234.

Thouvenel, Éric. 2010. Les images de l’eau dans le cinéma français des années 20. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

Warburg, Aby. 2012, L’Atlas Mnémosyne. Dijon: L’Écarquillé-INHA.

VanderBeek, Stan. 2011 [1966]. “Culture Intercom and Expanded cinema.” In Expanded Cinema: Art, Performance, Film, edited by A. L. Rees, Duncan White, Steven Ball, and David Curtis, 80–84. London: Tate.

Vaughan, Hunter. 2019. “Toward a Natural Screen Philosophy.” In Philosophy and Film. Bridging Divides, edited by Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva, and Steven S. Gouveia, 342–55. London-New York: Routledge.

Youngblood, Gene. 1970. Expanded cinema. New York: Dutton & Co.

Wall, Jeff. 2001 [1989]. “Photographie et intelligence liquide.” In Essais et entretiens. 1984-2001, edited by Jean-François Chevrier, 175–78. Paris: École des Beaux-Arts.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-22

How to Cite

Jouhannet, Élise. (2023). De l’intérêt de devenir-bulle: repenser la réalité virtuelle par le biais de la rondeur. Cinéma & Cie. Film and Media Studies Journal, 23(40), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.54103/2036-461X/19379