Video Activism and Activist Archiving: Collective Testimonies, Resilient Images and the Case of bak.ma
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2036-461X/21893Keywords:
Turkey, Video Activism, Digital Autonomous Archives, Counter-memory, bak.maAbstract
Video activism prominently advocates for human rights and justice by circulating records of abuses and state violence's impact on daily life. However, in the over-saturated online space, these images lose context amid constant sharing, demanding attention. Hence, organizing them within the framework of social struggles, resistance, and justice is crucial.
In this context, digital activist archive initiatives (e.g., 858.ma 2018; labournet.tv 2011; Arkib Filem Rakyat 2023; B’Tselem 2012) not only make sense of the surplus of internet images but also act as a counter-practice that challenges the states’ official archiving practices and its claim of monopoly over history. Activist archiving practices wrest control away from established institutions, enabling the dissemination of alternative histories through images. As a result, these archives preserve the experiences of social groups ignored by official ideology and foster the proliferation of grassroots practices. Furthermore, the video activist archive emerges as an alternative platform that is generated collectively to reproduce knowledge and sociopolitical relations based on solidarity.
This essay will center on a study of bak.ma - the digital media archive of social movements created following the Gezi Park protests (Istanbul, 2013). It seeks to examine how this archive constructs a social memory beyond state-approved knowledge and practices, achieved through decentralized and collective data collection that restores control of protest movements to the people. Additionally, this essay will also shed light on the challenges inherent in activist initiatives, encompassing issues like censorship, accessibility, the reproduction of knowledge, activist labor and sustainability.
References
Adal. Hikmet. “20 Yıllık Arşivine el konulan Oktay İnce: Demokrasi Mücadelesinin Görsel Belleğiydi.” Bianet: Bağımsız İletişim Ağı. Accessed 1 December 2023. https://m.bianet.org/bianet/insan-haklari/207829-20-yillik-arsivine-el-konulan-oktay-ince-demokrasi-mucadelesinin-gorsel-bellegiydi
Ahıska, Meltem. 2006. “Occidentalism and Registers of Truth: The Politics of Archives in Turkey.” New Perspectives on Turkey 34: 9–29. doi: 10.1017/S0896634600004350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600004350
Alemdar, Emrullah and Keleş, Savaş. 2019. Çağdaş Türk ve Dünya Tarihi. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Askanius, Tina, 2014. “Video for Change.” In The Handbook of Development Communication and Social Change, edited by Karin Gwinn Wilkins, Thomas Tufte, and Rafael Obregon, 453–470. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118505328.ch27
Azoulay, Ariella. 2017. “Archive.” Political Concepts a Critical Lexicon 1. Accessed 12 December 2023. https://www.politicalconcepts.org/archive-ariella-azoulay
Brunow, Dagmar. 2018. “Naming, Shaming, Framing? The ambivalence of queer visibility in audiovisual archives.” In The Power of Vulnerability: Mobilizing Affect in Feminist, Queer and Anti-racist Media Cultures, edited by. Anu Koivunen, Katariina Kyrölä & Ingrid Ryberg, 174–195. Manchester University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526133113.00017
Caswell, Michelle. 2021. Urgent Archives: Enacting Liberatory Memory Work. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001355
Cifor, Marika. 2017. Your Nostalgia is Killing Me: Activism, Affect and the Archives of HIV/AIDS. PhD diss., University of California.
Cook, Terry. 2012. “Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms.” Archival Science 13: 95–120. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
Çelikaslan, Özge and Şen, Alper. 2017. “Video Eylemden Politik Estetiğe!” In Videonun Eylemi, edited by Ege Berensel, 159–174. Istanbul: Alef Yayınevi.
Flinn, Andrew. 2011. “The Impact of Independent and Community Archives on Professional Archival Thinking and Practice.” In The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader, edited by J. Hill. London: Facet. 145–169.
Foucault, Michel. 1969. L’achéologie du savoir. Paris: Edition Gallimard.
Haciyakupoglu, Gulizar, and Weiyu Zhang. 2015. “Social Media and Trust during the Gezi Protests in Turkey.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20 (4): 450–466. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12121
Haskins, Ekaterina. 2007. “Between Archive and Participation: Public Memory in a Digital Age.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37 (4): 401–422. doi: 10.1080/02773940601086794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940601086794
Hogan, Mélanie. 2012. Crashing the Archive: A Research-Creation Intervention into the SAW Video Mediatheque. PhD diss., Concordia University.
Holman, Jones S. 2005. “Autoethnography: Making the personal political.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln, 763-791. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Human Rights Watch. “Turkey: End the Gezi Trial Injustice. Prosecutor’s Opinion on Appeal Devoid of Legal Arguments.” Human Rights Watch. Accessed 13 December 2023. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/07/12/turkey-end-gezi-trial-injustice
Özyürek, Esra. 2007. The Politics of Memory in Turkey. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Pad.ma. 2010. “10 Thesis on the Archive.” Accessed 13 December 2023. https://pad.ma/documents/OH
Pell, Susan. 2015. “Radicalizing the Politics of the Archive: An Ethnographic Reading of an Activist Archive.” Archivaria 80: 33–57.
Pell, Susan. 2020. “Documenting the Fight for the City: The Impact of Activist Archives on Anti-Gentrification Campaigns. Archives, Record-keeping and Social Justice.” Eds. David A. Wallace, Wendy Duff, Renee Saucier, and Andrew Flinn. London, UK: Routledge.
Prelinger, Rick. 2021. “Beyond Noblesse Oblige.” Activating the Archive. The Moving Image 21, no. 1: 145-155. muse.jhu.edu/article/834001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/movingimage.21.1-2.0145
Rigney, Ann. 2018. “Remembering Hope: Transnational activism beyond the traumatic.” Memory Studies, 11(3), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698018771869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698018771869
Schwartz, Joahn M. and Cook, Terry. 2002. “Archives, Records, and Power: The Making of Modern Memory”. Archival Science 2: 1–19. doi: 10.1007/BF02435628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628
Tunç, Asli. 2015. “Twitter Vs. Penguens on TV: #Geziparkprotests, Social Media Use, and the Y Generation in Turkey.” In The Eastern Mediterranean in Transition, edited by Spyridon N. Litsas and Aristotle Tziampris, 161–177. Farnham: Ashgate.
Yörük, Erdem, and Murat Yüksel. 2014. “Class and Politics in Turkey’s Gezi Protests.” New Left Review 89 (1): 103–123.
Zinn, Howard. 1977. “Secrecy, Archives, and the Public Interest.” The Midwestern Archivist 2 (2): 14–26.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sirin Fulya Erensoy, Ozge Celikaslan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
