Multipolarity in the Post-War Film Industries: An Introduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/2036-461X/30760Keywords:
Film industry, Post-war history, Transnational cinemas, Italian cinema, ANICA, Multipolarity, Film co-productions, Policy studies, International relationsAbstract
In this article, based on the evidence brought by TRAFFIC - Tracing American and Foreign Funds in Italian Cinema (1945-1962), a research project we were involved in the last few years and focused on the Italian case, we advance a set of methodological and operational hypotheses for the study of international relations in post-war cinema, developed in dialogue with the contributions collected in this issue. Our central claim is that a multipolar model of productive, distributive, and cultural relations was in place, in the years surrounding the Second World War, with timelines and durations that varied across geographical contexts and in relation to the specific challenges faced by different film industries. This model places under strain a fixed conception of centre-periphery relations, already questioned in transnational approaches to European cinema, as well as a monolithic understanding of the cultural and industrial dominance of American cinema, which nevertheless remained the key reference point in the global system.
After having summarized the scientific discussion on transnational cinemas to determine which elements can be retained and what new tools are needed to outline and study what we consider a multipolar system, in the following section we delve into the Italian case, focusing particularly on the trade association ANICA. During the post-war period, ANICA was structured as an interface between different systems, managing current practices such as export and co-production instructions and film credit guarantees, as well as strategic actions such as defining agreements and conducting periodic revisions. Two specific examples relating to the definition of exchange and co-production agreements with the film industries of Mexico and Yugoslavia illustrate ANICA’s concrete functioning in relation to other national and foreign entities, including public and private stakeholders. Finally, we reflect on the concept of borders as a key element in the relationship between film systems and infrastructures.
Downloads
References
ANICA. 1953. Peliculas italianas importadas por Mexico del 1° de enero 1952 al 30 septembre 1953. ANICA Archive. File 510. Rapporti con l’estero. Messico.
ANICA. [1954a]. Undated report on the state of Mexican film industry. ANICA Archive. File 510. Rapporti con l’estero. Messico.
ANICA. 1954b. Accord de co-production cinématographique mexicano-italienne. Archive. File 510. Rapporti con l’estero. Messico.
ANICA. 1955a. Protocole. ANICA Archive. File 613. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
ANICA. 1955b. Les thèses qui seront présentées aux Gouvernements de la République Populaire Fédérative de Yougoslavie et de la République d’Italie dans le but d’apporter un accord qui réglerait les rapports dans le domaine du film entre les deux pays. ANICA Archive. File 613. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
ANICA. 1957. Accordo ANICA-CIMEX 20 maggio 1957. ANICA Archive. File 520. Rapporti con l’estero. Messico.
ANICA. 1961. Verbale delle riunioni italo-jugoslave all’ANICA, 15–16 giugno 1961. ANICA Archive. File 540. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
Babić, Đorđe. 1953. Letter to Achille Valignani, 3 September 1953. ANICA Archive. File 510. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
Baltruschat, Doris. 2010. Global Media Ecologies. Networked Production in Film and Television. London–New York: Routledge.
Bergfelder, Tim. 2005. “National, Transnational or Supranational Cinema? Rethinking European Film Studies.” Media, Culture & Society 27(3): 315–331.
Blum, Andrew. 2013. Tubes: behind the scenes at the internet. London: Penguin.
Campilli, Guido. 1957. Letter to ANICA, 25 June 1957. ANICA Archive. File 520. Rapporti con l’estero. Messico.
Carli, Guido. 1988. “The return to convertibility of the European currencies”. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 47(11-12): 525-536.
Christie, Ian. 2013. “Where is National Cinema Today (and Do We Still Need It)?” Film History 25(1–2): 19–30.
Citrini, Matteo. 2025. “The Aftermaths of Rome 1957. The International Cinematographic Industry Associations Facing the European Single Market”. Immagine. Note di storia del cinema 29: 93–110.
Comand, Mariapia, and Simone Venturini. 2021. “Anica Cinematic Universe. Nuove fonti per lo studio dei modi e delle culture della produzione cinematografica italiana.” L’avventura. International Journal of Italian Film and Media Studies (special issue): 13–33.
Corsi, Barbara. 1996. “Eutanasia di un’unione”. In Identità italiana e identità europea nel cinema italiano. Dal 1945 al miracolo economico, edited by Giampiero Brunetta, 69–86. Torino: Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli.
De Pirro, Nicola. 1955. Letter to ANICA and UNIEF, “Temporanea esportazione di film italiani per tentarne la vendita in Jugoslavia”, 25 May 1955. ANICA Archive. File 516. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
Dezseri, Kalman, 2000. “Introducing Currency Convertibility in Western Europe in the 1950s”. Journal of European Economic History 29(1): 131-171.
Di Chiara, Francesco (ed.). 2025. Film Policies in Europe (1945–1980). A Comparative Approach to the History of State Aid for Film. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Di Chiara, Francesco and Paolo Noto. 2023. “Timber, horses and dollars in free currency: Film policy cycles and the Italian-Yugoslav 1957 co-production agreements”. Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies 11(3–4): 647–666.
Di Chiara, Francesco. 2025. “Comparing Film Policies in Europe (1945–1980): An Introduction”. In Film Policies in Europe (1945–1980). A Comparative Approach to the History of State Aid for Film, edited by Francesco Di Chiara, 1–32. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
di Chio, Federico. 2022. “Gli accordi ANICA-MPEA e l’impiego dei capitali americani nel nostro cinema / PARTE 1 – I primi due accordi e la promozione del cinema italiano all’estero.” Schermi. Storie e culture del cinema e dei media in Italia 6 (12): 95–111.
DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147-160.
Ďurovičová, Nataša. 2010. “Preface”. In World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, edited by Nataša Ďurovičová and Kathleen Newman, ix-xv. New York: Routledge.
Ďurovičová, Nataša, and Kathleen E. Newman (eds). 2010. World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Elsaesser, Thomas. 2005. European Cinema: Face to Face with Hollywood. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Gaddis, John. 1986. “The Long Peace. Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System”. International Security 10(4): 99-142.
Giovacchini, Saverio, and Robert Sklar (eds.). 2012. Global Neorealism: The Transnational History of a Film Style. Jackson: University of Mississippi.
Govil, Nitin. 2015. Orienting Hollywood: A Century of Film Culture between Los Angeles and Bombay. New York: New York University Press.
Grieveson, Lee, and Haidee Wasson (eds.). 2008. Inventing Film Studies. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Guback, Thomas H. 1985. “Hollywood’s International Market.” In The American Film Industry, edited by Tino Balio, 463–486. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Gurgo Salice, Pier Giuseppe. 1959. Letter to ANICA, “Yugoslavia”, 10 November 1959. ANICA Archive. File 530. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
Hammett-Jamart, Julia, Petar Mitric, and Eva Novrup Redvall (eds). 2018 European Film and Television Co-Production: Policy and Practice. Cham: Springer.
Hecht Lucari, Gianni. 1956. Letter to Ministry for Foreign Trade, DGS, and ANICA, “Casta diva – Jugoslavia”, 26 March 1956. ANICA Archive. File 613. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
Higbee, Will, Song Hwee Lim. 2010. “Concepts of Transnational Cinema: Towards a Critical Transnationalism in Film Studies.” Transnational Cinemas 1(1): 7–21.
Higson, Andrew. 2018. “The Circulation of European Films within Europe.” Comunicazioni sociali. Journal of Media, Performing Arts and Cultural Studies 3: 306–323.
Hjort, Mette, and Scott Mackenzie (eds). 2000. Cinema and Nation. London–New York: Routledge.
Hjort, Mette. 2010. “On the Plurality of Cinematic Transnationalism.” In World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, edited by Nataša Ďurovičová and Kathleen E. Newman, 12–33. New York: Routledge.
Holdaway, Dom, and Massimo Scaglioni. 2018. “From Distribution to Circulation Studies: Mapping Italian Films Abroad.” Comunicazioni sociali. Journal of Media, Performing Arts and Cultural Studies 3: 341–355.
Jones, Huw David. 2016. “The Cultural and Economic Implications of UK/European Co-Production.” Transnational Cinemas 7(1): 1–20.
Jones, Huw David. 2024. Transnational European Cinema. Representation, Audiences, Identity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lasswell, Harold D. 1971. A Pre-view of Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier Publishing.
Lee, Sangjoon. 2020. Cinema and the Cultural Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lo Duca, Joseph-Marie. 1954. Letter to Eitel Monaco, 23 August 1954. ANICA Archive. File 510. Rapporti con l’estero. Messico.
Lobato, Roman. 2019. Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution. New York: New York University Press.
Locatelli, Massimo. 2010. “La Camera Internazionale del Film e il cinema italiano”. In Storia del cinema italiano vol. VI 1940-1944, edited by Ernesto G. Laura. Venezia and Roma: Marsilio and Bianco & Nero, 425-432.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mehta, Monika, and Madhuja Mukherjee (eds). 2021. Industrial Networks and Cinemas of India: Shooting Stars, Shifting Geographies and Multiplying Media. Abingdon–New York: Routledge.
Mezzadra, Sandro, and Brett Neilson. 2013. Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham: Duke University Press.
Nagib, Lúcia, Chris Perriam, and Rajinder Dudrah (eds). 2012. Theorizing World Cinema. New York: I.B. Tauris.
Neale, Steve. 1981. “Art Cinema as Institution.” Screen 22(1): 11–40.
Noto, Paolo. 2023. “The Standard Exhibition Contracts in Italian Film Industry: A Neo-corporatist History.” L’avventura. International Journal of Italian Film and Media Studies (special issue): 73–92.
Noto, Paolo. 2025. “Patterns of Corporatism: The Italian Way to Film Policy (1945–1965)”. In Film Policies in Europe (1945–1980). A Comparative Approach to the History of State Aid for Film, edited by Francesco Di Chiara, 35-60. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Parc, Jimmyn. 2020. “Understanding Film Co-Production in the Era of Globalization: A Value Chain Approach.” Global Policy 2(4): 458–465.
Parks, Lisa, and Nicole Starosielski, 2015. “Introduction”. In Signal Traffic: Critical Studies of Media Infrastructures, edited by Lisa Parks and Nicole Starosielski, 1–27. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Pitassio, Francesco. 2019. Neorealist Film Culture, 1945–1954. Rome, Open Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Ružić, Jovan. 1955. Letter to Eitel Monaco, 24 February 1955. ANICA Archive. File 516. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
Samaddar, Ranabir. 1999. The Marginal Nation: Transborder Migration from Bangladesh to West Bengal. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Sedgwick, John (ed.). 2020. Towards a Comparative Economic History of Cinema, 1930-1970. Cham: Springer.
Steinhart, Daniel. 2019. Runaway Hollywood. Internationalizing Postwar Production and Location Shooting. Oakland: University of California Press.
Stubbs, Jonathan. 2021. “Unproductive Co-Production: European Integration, the British Film Industry and the Franco-British Co-Production Agreement of 1965.” Journal of British Cinema and Television 18(2): 152–175.
Stubbs, Jonathan. 2022. “A Common Market for Film: British Policy and the Unification of European Film.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 28(1): 45–60.
Tassinari, Cosimo. 2025. “‘Guerra e Pace’: storia economico-finanziaria di un ‘film cerniera’.” Immagine. Note di storia del cinema 29: 111–128.
Treveri Gennari, Daniela, Lies Van de Vijver, and Pierluigi Ercole (eds.). 2024. The Palgrave Handbook of Comparative New Cinema Histories. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Valignani, Achille. 1955a. Proposta per un eventuale accordo cinematografico italo-jugoslavo, 1 December 1955. ANICA Archive. File 516. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
Valignani, Achille. 1955b. Letter to Excelsa-Minerva, 15 April 1955. ANICA Archive. File 516. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
Valignani, Achille. 1956. Letter to Documento Film, “Casta Diva – Yugoslavia”, 9 April 1956. ANICA Archive. File 613. Rapporti con l’estero: Jugoslavia.
Valignani, Achille. 1959. Letter to associated companies, 6 November 1959. ANICA Archive. File 530. Rapporti con l’estero. Jugoslavia.
van Deth, Jan W. 1998. “Equivalence in comparative political research”. In Comparative Politics. The problem of equivalence, edited by Jan W. van Deth, 1–19. London–New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Giorgio Avezzù, Francesco Di Chiara, Paolo Noto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
