Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
header

Saggi per la call-sezione sottoposta a peer review

Núm. 10 (2025): Miscellanea III

The Algorithm Made a Musical: Performing Ratatouille on TikTok’s Virtual Stage

DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/connessioni/30206
Enviado
noviembre 22, 2025
Publicado
2025-12-31

Resumen

The increasing presence of algorithmic platforms within daily life calls for a reconfiguration of how people create, and how audiences engage with creativity: both professional and amateur creators must now navigate the challenge of performing for a potentially limitless audience embedded within an endless, algorithmically curated feed. This article examines Ratatouille: The Musical, a (mostly) crowd-sourced project born out of pandemic-fuelled boredom on TikTok, as a case study of cultural production on a platform structured by algorithmic visibility. We use this to understand the role that recommendation algorithms play in the popularisation of a given phenomenon, as well as how algorithmically imagined audiences (Jones, 2023) can participate in the development of a project. Moreover, we interrogate the concept of liveness, traditionally tied to co-present theatrical performance, to question how it might be redefined within digital, asynchronous, and algorithmically mediated contexts. By situating Ratatouille: The Musical within these intersecting frameworks, the article highlights how TikTok functions not merely as a platform for dissemination, but as a site of emergent, networked forms of performance and cultural production.

Citas

  1. Abercrombie N., Longhurst N., Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination, Sage, London 1998.
  2. Abidin C., Visibility Labour: Engaging With Influencers’ Fashion Brands and #OOTD Advertorial Campaigns on Instagram, in «Media International Australia», vol. 161, 2016, pp. 86–100.
  3. Baym N., Personal Connections in the Digital Age, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2010.
  4. Bhandari A., Bimo S., Why’s Everyone on TikTok Now? The Algorithmized Self and the Future of Self-Making on Social Media, in «Social Media + Society», vol. 8, 2022, doi: 10.1177/20563051221086241.
  5. Bonini T., Treré E., Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight against Platform Power, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2024.
  6. Burgess, J. E. (2007). Vernacular creativity and new media. (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology). https://creativitymachine.net/downloads/publications/JeanBurgessAoIR2006.pdf
  7. .
  8. Cheney-Lippold J., A New Algorithmic Identity: Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control, in «Theory, Culture & Society», vol. 28, 2011, pp. 164–181, doi: 10.1177/0263276411424420.
  9. Couldry N., Hepp A., Krotz F. (a cura di), Media Events in a Global Age, Routledge, London–New York, 2010.
  10. Curran N., Bridgerton the Musical: Does the Fate of the Stage Lie in the Hands of TikTok?, in «Varsity», 2 aprile 2021, https://www.varsity.co.uk/theatre/21086
  11. .
  12. Darvin R., Design, Resistance and the Performance of Identity on TikTok, in «Discourse, Context & Media», vol. 46, 2022, pp. 1–11, doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100591.
  13. Dayan D., Katz E., Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History, Harvard University Press, Cambridge–Massachusetts, 1994.
  14. Dickson EJ., An Oral History of ‘Ratatouille: The Musical’, in «Rolling Stone», 18 novembre 2020, https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ratatouille-tiktok-musical-oral-history-1091547/
  15. .
  16. Eriksson Krutrök M., Algorithmic Closeness in Mourning: Vernaculars of the Hashtag #grief on TikTok, in «Social Media + Society», vol. 7, 2021, doi: 10.1177/20563051211042396.
  17. Evans G., ‘Ratatouille: The TikTok Musical’: How Broadway Cooked Up The Perfect Appetizer For A New Year That Can’t Start Soon Enough, in «Deadline», 1 gennaio 2021, https://deadline.com/2021/01/ratatouille-tiktok-musical-benefit-disney-seaview-emily-jacobsen-tituss-burgess-actors-fund-1234663746/
  18. Frosh P., Pinchevski A., Media and Events after Media Events, in «Media, Culture & Society», vol. 40, 2018, pp. 135–138, doi: 10.1177/0163443717726007.
  19. Fuchs C., Labor in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet, in «The Information Society», vol. 26, 2010, pp. 179–196, doi: 10.1080/01972241003712215.
  20. Gemini L., Brilli S., Gradienti di liveness. Performance e comunicazione dal vivo nei contesti mediatizzati, FrancoAngeli, Milano, 2023.
  21. Guinaudeau B., Munger K., Votta F., Fifteen Seconds of Fame: TikTok and the Supply Side of Social Video, in «Computational Communication Research», vol. 4, 2022, pp. 463–485, doi: 10.5117/CCR2022.2.004.GUIN.
  22. Jerslev A., Contemporary Ceremonial Media Events – Time and Temporalities of Liveness, in «Nordic Journal of Media Studies», vol. 4, 2022, pp. 19–36, doi: 10.2478/njms-2022-0002.
  23. Jones C., How to Train Your Algorithm: The Struggle for Public Control over Private Audience Commodities on TikTok, in «Media, Culture & Society», vol. 45, 2023, pp. 1192–1209, doi: 10.1177/01634437231159555.
  24. Kamela M., Carpenter B., We Should Talk About Bruno: Discourse on TikTok as a Model for Scholarly Conversation, in «Current Studies in Librarianship», vol. 34, 2023, p. 5.
  25. Lessig L., Code Version 2.0, Basic Books, New York, 2006.
  26. Lessig L., Remix. Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy, Penguin, New York, 2008.
  27. Lupinacci L., “Absentmindedly Scrolling Through Nothing”: Liveness and Compulsory Continuous Connectedness in Social Media, in «Media, Culture & Society», vol. 43, 2021, pp. 273–290, doi: 10.1177/0163443720939454.
  28. Manovich L., Software Takes Command, Bloomsbury Academic, New York, 2013.
  29. Nieborg D. B., Poell T., The Platformization of Cultural Production: Theorizing the Contingent Cultural Commodity, in «New Media & Society», vol. 20, 2018, pp. 4275–4292, doi: 10.1177/1461444818769694.
  30. Parisi S., Firth E., «Il magico mondo dell’algoritmo.» Immaginario, percezione e interazione degli utenti di TikTok con l’algoritmo di piattaforma, in «Sociologia della Comunicazione», n. 66, 2023, pp. 60–76, doi: 10.3280/SC2023-066004.
  31. Poell T., Nieborg D. B., Duffy B. E., Platforms and Cultural Production, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2022.
  32. Schechner R., Performance Studies. An Introduction, Routledge, London–New York, 2002.
  33. Walton G. M., Cohen G. L., Cwir D., Spencer S. J., Mere Belonging: The Power of Social Connections, in «Journal of Personality and Social Psychology», vol. 102, 2012, pp. 513–532, doi: 10.1037/a0025731.
  34. Wieringa E., Ratatousical: What the TikTok Musical Says About Society, in «diggit magazine», 26 aprile 2021, https://www.diggitmagazine.com/papers/ratatousical-tiktok-musical?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  35. Zeng J., Schäfer M. S., Allgaier J., Reposting “Till Albert Einstein Is TikTok Famous”: The Memetic Construction of Science on TikTok, in «International Journal of Communication», vol. 15, 2021, pp. 3216–3247, DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8tdvm.
  36. Zulli D., Zulli D. J., Extending the Internet Meme: Conceptualizing Technological Mimesis and Imitation Publics on the TikTok Platform, in «New Media & Society», vol. 24, 2022, pp. 1872–1890, doi: 10.1177/1461444820983603.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.