Ecological Differences
Systems and Environments between General System Theory and Second-Order Cybernetics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13130/2239-5474/15656Keywords:
Second-Order Cybernetics, General Systems Theory, General Ecology, Operational closure, Autopoiesis, Systems EcologyAbstract
This paper investigates the ecological implications of two different trends in systems science: (1) Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s General Systems Theory (GST), which establishes the framework of Eugene Odum’s Systems Ecology; (2) Second-Order Cybernetics (SOC), a systemic approach outlined by Heinz von Foerster, Humberto Maturana, and Niklas Luhmann, in which the roots of a new ecological paradigm called General Ecology can be found.
In the article, GST and SOC will be compared with respect to their different ways of conceiving a system and its genesis; the role of the observer in defining the boundaries of a system; and the relation between system and environment.
It will be shown how SOC, contrasting the principle of hierarchical control of GST, leads to the notion of ecological differences, which indicates a plurality of system-environment dyads, problematizing the idea of environment as a physical and objective reference.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nóema
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
