Impact Of Nurse-Performed Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (Pocus) In Intensive Care: A Systematic Review Protocol

Marco Abagnale; Melania De Filippo; Francesco Limonti; Luciano Cecere; Rita Citarella; Fabio Gennaro Abagnale; Valeria Visconti; Roberta Maria Giuliana Licciardi; Francesco Gravante

doi:10.54103/dn/29708

Authors

Marco Abagnale Anestesiologia e Terapia Intensiva, Ospedale M. Scarlato, Scafati, ASL Salerno https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5639-6142
Melania De Filippo Department of Abdominal Oncology, Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS "Fondazione G.Pascale”, Napoli, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7634-0284
Francesco Limonti Department of Cardio-Toraco Vascular, A.O.U. Sant’Anna, Ferrara, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4781-7715
Luciano Cecere Department of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8605-0014
Rita Citarella Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia, "Umberto I" Hospital, Asl Salerno, Salerno, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1983-1440
Fabio Gennaro Abagnale Department of Critical Care, Unit of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Local Health of Salerno, M. Scarlato Hospital, Scafati (SA), 84018, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8972-7106
Valeria Visconti Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, M. Scarlato Hospital, Scafati (SA), 84018, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0259-0067
Roberta Maria Giuliana Licciardi Department of Critical Care, Unit of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Local Health of Salerno, M. Scarlato Hospital, Scafati (SA), 84018, Italy
Francesco Gravante Department of Critical Care, Local Health Authority of Caserta,San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Aversa, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3548-6018

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54103/dn/29708

Keywords:

Intensive care, Nurse-performed ultrasound, Critical Care Nursing, Clinical decision-making, Systematic Review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in critical care to support real-time clinical decision-making. Although traditionally performed by physicians, recent advances have enabled nurses to integrate POCUS into their practice. In the intensive care unit (ICU), where timely and accurate assessments are critical, POCUS performed by nurses can improve diagnostic accuracy, guide clinical interventions, and improve patient outcomes. However, the overall impact of this practice has not yet been systematically evaluated. Aim: This systematic review aims in terms of clinical decision-making, diagnostic accuracy, timeliness of care, and patient-related outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The protocol follows the PRISMA-P 2015 guidelines and is registered in PROSPERO (N. CRD420251114795). A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in four databases: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science. The review will include primary peer-reviewed studies involving adult ICU patients and assessing POCUS performed by nurses. The quality of the study will be evaluated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. Data will be synthesized narratively and quantitatively, where possible.

EXPECTED RESULTS: This review will provide a structured synthesis of existing evidence on nurse-led POCUS in intensive care. It will explore its clinical utility and influence on decision-making, care quality, and patient outcomes.

DISCUSSION: Findings are expected to inform clinical practice, training strategies, and policy development to integrate nurse-performed POCUS into ICU protocols. This review may also identify gaps in the literature to guide future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Knutsen K, Solbakken R. Utilisation of point-of-care ultrasound by critical care nurses: a scoping review protocol. BMJ open. 2025 Jun 10;15(6):e100911.

2. Brunhoeber LA, King J, Davis S, Witherspoon B. Nurse Practitioner Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Critical Care. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2018 May 1;14(5):383–8.

3. Su H, Wang N, Li Z, Dong X, Chen G, Cao L. The Experiences of Critical Care Nurses Implementing Point-Of-Care Ultrasound: A Qualitative Study. Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70104.

4. Kalam S, Selden N, Haycock K, Lowe T, Skaggs H, Dinh VA. Evaluating the Effect of Nursing-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound on Septic Emergency Department Patients. Cureus. 2023 Jun;15(6):e40519.

5. Corcoran E, Hopkins P, Fisher R, Wong A, Rose L. Intensive care nurse‐led point of care ultrasound in the assessment and management of the critically ill COVID‐19 patient: A single centre case series. Nursing in Critical Care. 2023 Sep 1;28(5):781–8.

6. Totenhofer R, Luck L, Wilkes L. Point of care ultrasound use by Registered Nurses and Nurse Practitioners in clinical practice: An integrative review. Collegian. 2021 Aug 1;28(4):456–63.

7. Crager S, Cinkowski C, Gharahbaghian L. 390: TRAINING NURSES TO ASSESS FLUID STATUS USING POINT-OF-CARE ULTRASOUND. Critical Care Medicine. 2018 Jan 1;46:178.

8. Gimenes FRE, Stabile AM, Bernardes RM, Santos VB, Menegueti MG, Prado PR do, et al. Advancing Digital Education Technologies by Empowering Nurses With Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Research Protocols. 2024 Oct 23;13(1):e58030.

9. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. 2015 Jan 2 [cited 2025 Feb 8]; Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g7647

10. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1.

11. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210.

12. 7. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk - JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis - JBI Global Wiki [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 9]. Available from: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355598596/7.+Systematic+reviews+of+etiology+and+risk

13. Gong C, Shen Y, Wang J, Zhang P, Li Z. Application of ultrasound simulation training in intensive care nursing teaching. BMC Medical Education. 2025 Apr 17;25(1):566.

14. Soni NJ, Boyd JS, Mints G, Proud KC, Jensen TP, Liu G, et al. Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultrasound J. 2021 Sep 6;13(1):39.

15. Lipsitz M, Levin L, Sharma V, Herrala J, Rimawi A, Bernier D, et al. The State of Point-of-Care Teleultrasound Use for Educational Purposes: A Scoping Review. J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Aug;41(8):1889–906.

16. Kulas P, Schick B, Helfrich J, Bozzato A, Hecker DJ, Pillong L. Assessing the Use of Telepresence-Guided Video-Based Head and Neck Ultrasound Training: A Step towards Minimizing Dependence on Human Resources? Diagnostics. 2023 Jan;13(17):2828.

17. Hermann M, Hafner C, Scharner V, Hribersek M, Maleczek M, Schmid A, et al. Remote real-time supervision of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound: a feasibility study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Mar 24;30(1):23.

18. Lai T, Stafinski T, Beach J, Menon D. Is remotely supervised ultrasound (tele-ultrasound) inferior to the traditional service model of ultrasound with an in-person imaging specialist? A systematic review. The Ultrasound Journal. 2025 Jul 28;17(1):34.