The Impact of Emotional Burden on Caregivers: A Descriptive Correlational Study in the Province of Piacenza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54103/dn/28182Keywords:
Caregiver burden, Cancer patients, Distress Thermometer, Emotional distress, Patient distress, Psychosocial support, Nurse, Oncology, Zarit Burden Interview, Work-life balance.Abstract
Background: The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) is a validated tool for assessing caregiver burden, while the Distress Thermometer (DT) measures patient distress. Research highlights a correlation between patient and caregiver burden, influenced by treatment type, duration, and disease progression. Interventions targeting caregivers can indirectly benefit patients by addressing insights from these tools.
Objective: To evaluate caregiver burden and patient distress and analyze related factors.
Methods: The ZBI (22 items, Likert scale, threshold ≥24) assessed caregiver burden, and the DT (threshold ≥4) measured patient distress.
Results: Patients were older than caregivers, with both groups predominantly female and residing in Piacenza province. Emotional distress affected 58.38% of patients, with worry and fatigue being most common, while 23.78% of caregivers reported significant burden, primarily fears about the future. A positive correlation (r=0.387) was found between patient distress and caregiver burden.
Conclusions: These findings highlight the interconnectedness of patient distress and caregiver burden, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to support caregivers, particularly younger women balancing multiple responsibilities, and to address the emotional and physical challenges faced by oncology patients undergoing intensive treatments
Implications for Practice: The significant correlation between patient distress and caregiver burden underscores the importance of integrating routine caregiver assessments into clinical oncology practice
Foundational: This study reinforces the established link between patient distress and caregiver burden in oncology. The use of validated tools such as the ZBI and DT to assess caregiver burden and patient distress establishes a reliable framework for assessing these factors in clinical practice
Downloads
References
1. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: A meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003;18(2):250-267. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.250.
2. Schulz R, Sherwood PR. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. Am J Nurs. 2008;108(9 Suppl):23-27. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000336406.45248.4c.
3. Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW. Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):317-339. doi:10.3322/caac.20081.
4. Bovero A, Cherasco P, Torta R. Efficacia della strategia di incoraggiamento ai caregivers di pazienti oncologici terminali. Riv Psicol Individ. 2010;(4):4-51.
5. Grassi O, Oleari F, Citterio C, et al. Cure a casa: posizionamento di dispositivo venoso a domicilio per pazienti non autonomi durante la pandemia COVID-19. Da attività in emergenza a pratica routinaria. Recenti Prog Med. 2022;113(9):3907-38894. doi:10.1701/3907.38894.
6. Ministero della Salute Emilia-Romagna. Indagine conoscitiva sugli strumenti e sulle modalità di valutazione dello stress del caregiver familiare. Published 2019.
7. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980;20(6):649-655. doi:10.1093/geront/20.6.649.
8. Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: A pilot study. Cancer. 1998;82(10):1904-1908. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1904::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-X.
9. Schreiner A. Zarit Burden Interview – elementi esplicativi. Published 2006.
10. Al-Shaaobi A, Alahdal M, Yu S, Pan H. The efficiency of distress thermometer in the determination of supporting needs for cancer inpatients. Libyan J Med. 2021;16(1):1957199. doi:10.1080/19932820.2021.1957199.
11. Zhu Y, Pei X, Chen X, Li T. Family caregivers’ experiences of caring for advanced cancer patients: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Cancer Nurs. 2023;46(4):270-283. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000001104.
12. Schrank B, Ebert-Vogel A, Amering M, et al. Gender differences in caregiver burden and its determinants in family members of terminally ill cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2016;25(7):808-814. doi:10.1002/pon.4005.
13. AIOM. I numeri del cancro in Italia 2023. Published 2024.
14. Zacharia M, Karekla M. The role of psychologists and psychological approaches in cancer care. In: Kassianos AP, ed. Handbook of Quality of Life in Cancer. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2022:311-337. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84702-9_19.
15. Schuit AS, Holtmaat K, Van Zwieten V, et al. Organizing psycho-oncological care for cancer patients: The patient’s perspective. Front Psychol. 2021;12:625117. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625117.
16. McFarland DC, Holland JC. The management of psychological issues in oncology. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2016;14(12):999-1009.
17. Strada EA. Clinical psychology in palliative care. In: Cherny NI, Fallon MT, Kaasa S, Portenoy RK, Currow DC, eds. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2021:241-247. doi:10.1093/med/9780198821328.003.0026.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Letizia Franzini, Martina Maserati, Gabriele Cremona, Luigi Cavanna, Francesca Costa, Chiara Citterio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2025-05-29
Published 2025-07-31





